https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53076 The Tribunal set aside the duty demand against the appellants for storage tanks manufactured by another company, ruling that the duty was payable by the manufacturing company, not the appellants. As a result, the duty demand against the appellants was overturned, and the issue of whether the tanks were liable for central excise duty was not addressed further. The appeal of the appellants was allowed with any consequential relief permissible by law. en-us Mon, 23 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Oct 2010 14:58:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53076 The Tribunal set aside the duty demand against the appellants for storage tanks manufactured by another company, ruling that the duty was payable by the manufacturing company, not the appellants. As a result, the duty demand against the appellants was overturned, and the issue of whether the tanks were liable for central excise duty was not addressed further. The appeal of the appellants was allowed with any consequential relief permissible by law. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 23 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53076