<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 201 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53070</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai upheld the decision of the first appellate authority and dismissed the department&#039;s appeal regarding a penalty imposed on a party for delayed payment of duty. The penalty was deemed unjust as interest had already been paid for the delay, and imposing two penalties for the same offense was considered impermissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 14:25:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 201 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53070</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai upheld the decision of the first appellate authority and dismissed the department&#039;s appeal regarding a penalty imposed on a party for delayed payment of duty. The penalty was deemed unjust as interest had already been paid for the delay, and imposing two penalties for the same offense was considered impermissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>