https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796358 Admission of cheque execution triggers statutory presumptions of consideration and discharge of legally enforceable liability in dishonour proceedings. Those presumptions require cogent rebuttal evidence; an unsupported claim that a blank cheque was given as security, a delayed demand for its return, failure to respond to the demand notice, and unproved allegations of the complainant's financial incapacity do not displace them. Revisional jurisdiction remains supervisory rather than appellate: concurrent factual findings should not be overturned by reassessing evidence unless they are perverse, grossly erroneous, unsupported by material, omit relevant material, or reflect arbitrary discretion. The stated principles support restoration of the concurrent conviction for cheque dishonour. en-us Tue, 04 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Aug 2026 08:48:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796358 Admission of cheque execution triggers statutory presumptions of consideration and discharge of legally enforceable liability in dishonour proceedings. Those presumptions require cogent rebuttal evidence; an unsupported claim that a blank cheque was given as security, a delayed demand for its return, failure to respond to the demand notice, and unproved allegations of the complainant's financial incapacity do not displace them. Revisional jurisdiction remains supervisory rather than appellate: concurrent factual findings should not be overturned by reassessing evidence unless they are perverse, grossly erroneous, unsupported by material, omit relevant material, or reflect arbitrary discretion. The stated principles support restoration of the concurrent conviction for cheque dishonour. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 04 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796358