https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796358 Admission of cheque execution triggers statutory presumptions of consideration and discharge of liability, which the accused must displace with cogent evidence. A security-cheque defence unsupported by contemporaneous material, a belated demand for return of the cheque, failure to respond to the demand notice, and unproven allegations of the complainant's financial incapacity do not rebut those presumptions. The notes further state that revisional jurisdiction is supervisory, not appellate: concurrent factual findings may be disturbed only for perversity, gross error, reliance on irrelevant or no material, non-consideration of relevant material, or arbitrary discretion. Reappreciation of evidence without such defects exceeds revisional limits. en-us Tue, 04 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Aug 2026 08:48:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796358 Admission of cheque execution triggers statutory presumptions of consideration and discharge of liability, which the accused must displace with cogent evidence. A security-cheque defence unsupported by contemporaneous material, a belated demand for return of the cheque, failure to respond to the demand notice, and unproven allegations of the complainant's financial incapacity do not rebut those presumptions. The notes further state that revisional jurisdiction is supervisory, not appellate: concurrent factual findings may be disturbed only for perversity, gross error, reliance on irrelevant or no material, non-consideration of relevant material, or arbitrary discretion. Reappreciation of evidence without such defects exceeds revisional limits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 04 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796358