<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 237 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796364</link>
    <description>Extended limitation for service-tax demands based on third-party income-tax data is inapplicable where filed ST-3 returns and departmental records disclose the relevant receipts and do not support suppression. The notes state that demands founded on an unverified assumption of non-filing cannot validly cover all Form 26AS receipts. For manpower-supply services, tax paid by recipients under the applicable reverse-charge mechanism cannot be recovered again from the service provider. Timely return filing also defeats late-fee allegations, while interest and penalties require a sustainable principal demand. The stated principle is that verified statutory records and prior discharge of reverse-charge liability preclude duplicate recovery.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 08:48:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 237 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796364</link>
      <description>Extended limitation for service-tax demands based on third-party income-tax data is inapplicable where filed ST-3 returns and departmental records disclose the relevant receipts and do not support suppression. The notes state that demands founded on an unverified assumption of non-filing cannot validly cover all Form 26AS receipts. For manpower-supply services, tax paid by recipients under the applicable reverse-charge mechanism cannot be recovered again from the service provider. Timely return filing also defeats late-fee allegations, while interest and penalties require a sustainable principal demand. The stated principle is that verified statutory records and prior discharge of reverse-charge liability preclude duplicate recovery.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796364</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>