<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 245 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796372</link>
    <description>Article 227 supervisory jurisdiction does not permit the High Court to pre-empt the NCLT&#039;s initial determination of objections to its jurisdiction, the maintainability of execution petitions, or the executability of an NCLAT order under the Companies Act. Those objections must be pursued before the NCLT. Stay of the execution proceedings was also declined because related civil appeals were pending before the Supreme Court, which had granted only limited interim relief. Any further stay was to be sought in those appeals before the Supreme Court. The petitioners were therefore directed to pursue their substantive objections before the NCLT and interim relief before the Supreme Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 08:48:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 245 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796372</link>
      <description>Article 227 supervisory jurisdiction does not permit the High Court to pre-empt the NCLT&#039;s initial determination of objections to its jurisdiction, the maintainability of execution petitions, or the executability of an NCLAT order under the Companies Act. Those objections must be pursued before the NCLT. Stay of the execution proceedings was also declined because related civil appeals were pending before the Supreme Court, which had granted only limited interim relief. Any further stay was to be sought in those appeals before the Supreme Court. The petitioners were therefore directed to pursue their substantive objections before the NCLT and interim relief before the Supreme Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>