https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796383 A plaint alleging that property was acquired in a son's name from joint family income and held for the joint family does not, on its face, establish a benami transaction. At the Order 7 Rule 11 stage, consideration is confined to plaint averments and annexed documents. The notes state that statutory exclusions cover property held by a Hindu undivided family's Karta or member for family benefit from known sources, and property acquired in a child's name from known individual sources. A benami objection may be proved at trial, but cannot justify threshold rejection unless the pleadings plainly disclose a statutory benami transaction. en-us Tue, 14 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Aug 2026 08:48:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796383 A plaint alleging that property was acquired in a son's name from joint family income and held for the joint family does not, on its face, establish a benami transaction. At the Order 7 Rule 11 stage, consideration is confined to plaint averments and annexed documents. The notes state that statutory exclusions cover property held by a Hindu undivided family's Karta or member for family benefit from known sources, and property acquired in a child's name from known individual sources. A benami objection may be proved at trial, but cannot justify threshold rejection unless the pleadings plainly disclose a statutory benami transaction. Case-Laws Benami Property Tue, 14 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796383