<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 257 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796384</link>
    <description>Arm&#039;s length remuneration to a dependent agent permanent establishment exhausts further profit attribution where it fully reflects the agent&#039;s functions, assets and risks. The notes state that the enhancement rested exclusively on a revision order that had been quashed, while the agent&#039;s cost-plus remuneration was accepted as arm&#039;s length without any transfer-pricing adjustment or finding of inadequate pricing. Further attribution is permissible only if the arm&#039;s length analysis is deficient. The profit voluntarily offered under the dual taxpayer approach remained chargeable, and no additional profit attribution beyond the accepted remuneration was sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 08:48:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 257 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796384</link>
      <description>Arm&#039;s length remuneration to a dependent agent permanent establishment exhausts further profit attribution where it fully reflects the agent&#039;s functions, assets and risks. The notes state that the enhancement rested exclusively on a revision order that had been quashed, while the agent&#039;s cost-plus remuneration was accepted as arm&#039;s length without any transfer-pricing adjustment or finding of inadequate pricing. Further attribution is permissible only if the arm&#039;s length analysis is deficient. The profit voluntarily offered under the dual taxpayer approach remained chargeable, and no additional profit attribution beyond the accepted remuneration was sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>