<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 259 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796386</link>
    <description>Delay in filing quantum and penalty appeals may be condoned where the assessee was not effectively informed of assessment and penalty proceedings because notices were sent to an accountant&#039;s registered email and were not received at the relevant addresses. Prompt action after learning of the demand, including obtaining certified copies and filing appeals within thirty days, supports condonation. Dismissing appeals without requesting a condonation application or supporting evidence denies a meaningful opportunity to establish service and causes prejudice. During transition to faceless proceedings, procedural technicalities should not override substantial justice where no malice or gross negligence is apparent; the appeals were restored for merits adjudication after hearing both parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 08:48:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 259 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796386</link>
      <description>Delay in filing quantum and penalty appeals may be condoned where the assessee was not effectively informed of assessment and penalty proceedings because notices were sent to an accountant&#039;s registered email and were not received at the relevant addresses. Prompt action after learning of the demand, including obtaining certified copies and filing appeals within thirty days, supports condonation. Dismissing appeals without requesting a condonation application or supporting evidence denies a meaningful opportunity to establish service and causes prejudice. During transition to faceless proceedings, procedural technicalities should not override substantial justice where no malice or gross negligence is apparent; the appeals were restored for merits adjudication after hearing both parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>