https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53066 The tribunal ruled against the appellant in a case involving the classification of products as Ayurvedic medicaments. Despite the appellant's arguments and previous court decisions, the tribunal found that the use of synthetic ingredients, such as synthetic Methyl Salicylate and Menthol, in the products did not align with the requirements for Ayurvedic classification. Additionally, the tribunal upheld the extended period of limitation for demanding Central Excise duty due to the appellant's non-disclosure of the use of synthetic ingredients, leading to the imposition of fines and penalties. The appeal was ultimately rejected, and the decision against the appellants was affirmed. en-us Fri, 13 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Oct 2010 14:15:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53066 The tribunal ruled against the appellant in a case involving the classification of products as Ayurvedic medicaments. Despite the appellant's arguments and previous court decisions, the tribunal found that the use of synthetic ingredients, such as synthetic Methyl Salicylate and Menthol, in the products did not align with the requirements for Ayurvedic classification. Additionally, the tribunal upheld the extended period of limitation for demanding Central Excise duty due to the appellant's non-disclosure of the use of synthetic ingredients, leading to the imposition of fines and penalties. The appeal was ultimately rejected, and the decision against the appellants was affirmed. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 13 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53066