<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 280 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796407</link>
    <description>Section 68 additions for trade advances, sundry creditors and unsecured loans were deleted where accepted books, confirmations, tax records, financial statements and bank evidence established identity, source and genuineness; a brought-forward loan balance was not a credit of the relevant year. Cash deposits and recorded search cash were explained through cash books, withdrawals and accepted turnover, defeating section 69A additions. Verified bank-funded credit-card payments and reconciled GST purchase differences did not constitute unexplained expenditure under section 69C. Gold and jewellery not owned by the assessee, or attributable to a jointly residing family member, could not be treated as unexplained investment under section 69B.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 08:48:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 280 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796407</link>
      <description>Section 68 additions for trade advances, sundry creditors and unsecured loans were deleted where accepted books, confirmations, tax records, financial statements and bank evidence established identity, source and genuineness; a brought-forward loan balance was not a credit of the relevant year. Cash deposits and recorded search cash were explained through cash books, withdrawals and accepted turnover, defeating section 69A additions. Verified bank-funded credit-card payments and reconciled GST purchase differences did not constitute unexplained expenditure under section 69C. Gold and jewellery not owned by the assessee, or attributable to a jointly residing family member, could not be treated as unexplained investment under section 69B.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>