<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 236 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53064</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on an electronic yarn evenness tester was treated as admissible because the item was used for quality control in relation to manufacture. It was not regarded as equipment that itself brought about material change or directly processed goods, but credit was still available as an input used in or in relation to manufacture where capital goods credit under Rule 57Q was unavailable. The tribunal&#039;s earlier decision on the same functional issue remained binding on the Commissioner (Appeals), and a pending reference application did not reduce its effect absent a stay. Classification under Heading 84.71 did not by itself justify denial once functional eligibility was established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 13:30:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 236 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53064</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on an electronic yarn evenness tester was treated as admissible because the item was used for quality control in relation to manufacture. It was not regarded as equipment that itself brought about material change or directly processed goods, but credit was still available as an input used in or in relation to manufacture where capital goods credit under Rule 57Q was unavailable. The tribunal&#039;s earlier decision on the same functional issue remained binding on the Commissioner (Appeals), and a pending reference application did not reduce its effect absent a stay. Classification under Heading 84.71 did not by itself justify denial once functional eligibility was established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>