https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796429 Availability of a further statutory appeal required the petitioner to pursue that remedy rather than seek adjudication of the writ claims. The non-availability of the appellate tribunal did not justify bypassing the statutory appellate framework where the appeal remained available. The petitioner was relegated to the appellate remedy, and the intervening period was directed to be excluded for limitation purposes. en-us Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Aug 2026 08:48:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796429 Availability of a further statutory appeal required the petitioner to pursue that remedy rather than seek adjudication of the writ claims. The non-availability of the appellate tribunal did not justify bypassing the statutory appellate framework where the appeal remained available. The petitioner was relegated to the appellate remedy, and the intervening period was directed to be excluded for limitation purposes. Case-Laws GST Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796429