<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 2192 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470690</link>
    <description>Reassessment based on an assessee being a non-filer and non-PAN entity is invalid where the return of income had already been filed and disclosed the property transaction relied on for reopening. The return, computation and tax-deduction details showed that the foundational assumptions for reassessment were factually incorrect. Consequently, the reassessment proceedings and resulting assessment were treated as void from inception, with the issue decided in the assessee&#039;s favour.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 20:51:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 2192 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470690</link>
      <description>Reassessment based on an assessee being a non-filer and non-PAN entity is invalid where the return of income had already been filed and disclosed the property transaction relied on for reopening. The return, computation and tax-deduction details showed that the foundational assumptions for reassessment were factually incorrect. Consequently, the reassessment proceedings and resulting assessment were treated as void from inception, with the issue decided in the assessee&#039;s favour.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>