<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 2151 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470700</link>
    <description>Merger-related goodwill amortisation is treated as a non-operating expense for transfer-pricing operating-margin purposes because it is abnormal, non-recurring and unrelated to the provision of IT services; it must therefore be excluded from operating costs. Companies engaged in diversified high-end, consulting, analytics, product-engineering or digital services, with significant intangibles, absent segmental data, supernormal profits or excessive turnover, are unsuitable comparables for a captive IT-service provider and must be removed from the comparable set. Rule 46A does not apply where segmental information was furnished during assessment and later material merely clarifies that approach; no remand report is required.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 20:51:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 2151 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470700</link>
      <description>Merger-related goodwill amortisation is treated as a non-operating expense for transfer-pricing operating-margin purposes because it is abnormal, non-recurring and unrelated to the provision of IT services; it must therefore be excluded from operating costs. Companies engaged in diversified high-end, consulting, analytics, product-engineering or digital services, with significant intangibles, absent segmental data, supernormal profits or excessive turnover, are unsuitable comparables for a captive IT-service provider and must be removed from the comparable set. Rule 46A does not apply where segmental information was furnished during assessment and later material merely clarifies that approach; no remand report is required.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>