<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 153 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53051</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the authorization given by the Commissioner to the Deputy Commissioner to file an appeal was valid. It emphasized that the right of Revenue to appeal against an illegal order is substantive, and authorizing a different officer is a procedural matter. The Tribunal overturned the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and remanded the matter for a fresh decision on merits, allowing the Department&#039;s appeal by way of remand, setting aside the earlier decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 12:27:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 153 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53051</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the authorization given by the Commissioner to the Deputy Commissioner to file an appeal was valid. It emphasized that the right of Revenue to appeal against an illegal order is substantive, and authorizing a different officer is a procedural matter. The Tribunal overturned the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and remanded the matter for a fresh decision on merits, allowing the Department&#039;s appeal by way of remand, setting aside the earlier decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>