<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 2071 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470675</link>
    <description>Extended limitation for denying Cenvat credit was unavailable where similarly placed assessees had received the credit and Revenue had challenged those favourable orders, demonstrating divergent departmental views on entitlement. The show-cause notice was therefore time-barred, making the denial of Cenvat credit and the impugned order unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 18:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 2071 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470675</link>
      <description>Extended limitation for denying Cenvat credit was unavailable where similarly placed assessees had received the credit and Revenue had challenged those favourable orders, demonstrating divergent departmental views on entitlement. The show-cause notice was therefore time-barred, making the denial of Cenvat credit and the impugned order unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>