<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 2071 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470675</link>
    <description>Divergent departmental views on entitlement to Cenvat credit, evidenced by credit being allowed to similarly placed assessees while Revenue challenged those decisions, precluded invocation of the extended limitation period. The note states that the show-cause notice was therefore time-barred, making the denial of Cenvat credit and the impugned order unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 18:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 2071 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470675</link>
      <description>Divergent departmental views on entitlement to Cenvat credit, evidenced by credit being allowed to similarly placed assessees while Revenue challenged those decisions, precluded invocation of the extended limitation period. The note states that the show-cause notice was therefore time-barred, making the denial of Cenvat credit and the impugned order unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>