<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 1542 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470668</link>
    <description>Assessment based on material seized from a person other than the assessee falls within the framework of Section 153C, not Section 153A, where no incriminating material is found from the assessee. An alleged partnership does not change the assessee&#039;s status for this purpose. Seized documents that are not regular books or transaction records cannot support additions without independent evidence linking them to undisclosed income or expenditure. The rebuttable presumption under Section 132(4A) applies against the person from whose possession the material was found and cannot, without corroboration, justify additions against another person. Selective reliance on uncorroborated material is impermissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 11:35:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 1542 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470668</link>
      <description>Assessment based on material seized from a person other than the assessee falls within the framework of Section 153C, not Section 153A, where no incriminating material is found from the assessee. An alleged partnership does not change the assessee&#039;s status for this purpose. Seized documents that are not regular books or transaction records cannot support additions without independent evidence linking them to undisclosed income or expenditure. The rebuttable presumption under Section 132(4A) applies against the person from whose possession the material was found and cannot, without corroboration, justify additions against another person. Selective reliance on uncorroborated material is impermissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>