https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796338 Reassessment cannot be reopened merely because investigation information shows subsequent cash withdrawals by a payment recipient where the assessee had disclosed and substantiated the underlying purchase transactions in the original scrutiny assessment. Invoices for cotton purchases had already been examined under Section 143(3), while the recipient proprietor's cash withdrawals did not provide new tangible material showing that the assessee's income had escaped assessment. Such reopening constitutes a fishing and roving inquiry and an impermissible change of opinion. The reassessment notice was quashed. en-us Mon, 27 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Aug 2026 08:39:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796338 Reassessment cannot be reopened merely because investigation information shows subsequent cash withdrawals by a payment recipient where the assessee had disclosed and substantiated the underlying purchase transactions in the original scrutiny assessment. Invoices for cotton purchases had already been examined under Section 143(3), while the recipient proprietor's cash withdrawals did not provide new tangible material showing that the assessee's income had escaped assessment. Such reopening constitutes a fishing and roving inquiry and an impermissible change of opinion. The reassessment notice was quashed. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 27 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796338