<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 226 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796353</link>
    <description>Provisional attachment of the petitioners&#039; bank accounts was challenged, alongside their request for de-freezing. The writ petitions were disposed of with directions for the petitioners&#039; authorised representatives to appear before the investigating authority on the specified date. The text does not state any determination on the validity of the attachment or entitlement to de-freezing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 08:39:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915130" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 226 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796353</link>
      <description>Provisional attachment of the petitioners&#039; bank accounts was challenged, alongside their request for de-freezing. The writ petitions were disposed of with directions for the petitioners&#039; authorised representatives to appear before the investigating authority on the specified date. The text does not state any determination on the validity of the attachment or entitlement to de-freezing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>