<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Agreement to tolerate an act requires a separate contract, so retained insurance premiums escape service tax.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102333</link>
    <description>Agreement to tolerate an act as a declared service requires an independent contractual arrangement specifically providing for tolerance and a direct nexus between that arrangement and consideration. Retention of life-insurance premiums following policy lapse for non-payment or repudiation for mis-declaration did not meet those requirements: the insurance contract contained no separate tolerance agreement, and the policy became void without further insurance service. The retained premium was therefore not consideration for a distinct declared service, and taxing it would also create double taxation. The service-tax demand, interest and penalties were unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 08:39:30 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 08:39:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Agreement to tolerate an act requires a separate contract, so retained insurance premiums escape service tax.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102333</link>
      <description>Agreement to tolerate an act as a declared service requires an independent contractual arrangement specifically providing for tolerance and a direct nexus between that arrangement and consideration. Retention of life-insurance premiums following policy lapse for non-payment or repudiation for mis-declaration did not meet those requirements: the insurance contract contained no separate tolerance agreement, and the policy became void without further insurance service. The retained premium was therefore not consideration for a distinct declared service, and taxing it would also create double taxation. The service-tax demand, interest and penalties were unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 08:39:30 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>