https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470642 Out-of-turn hearing was sought on the basis of the revenue involved, while the respondent submitted that the dispute concerned only non-imposition of fine and penalty. The CESTAT Chennai found that the appeals did not warrant priority listing and rejected the miscellaneous applications for early hearing. The order addresses scheduling of the appeals and does not decide the underlying issues relating to fine or penalty. en-us Mon, 16 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Aug 2026 19:04:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470642 Out-of-turn hearing was sought on the basis of the revenue involved, while the respondent submitted that the dispute concerned only non-imposition of fine and penalty. The CESTAT Chennai found that the appeals did not warrant priority listing and rejected the miscellaneous applications for early hearing. The order addresses scheduling of the appeals and does not decide the underlying issues relating to fine or penalty. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 16 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470642