<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Learning from reported chain of judgments - in action of assessee or his representatives and non-cooperation with tax authority must be avoided. Prompt compliance is always good.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17088</link>
    <description>Taxpayer cooperation in assessment and appeal proceedings requires prompt replies to show-cause notices, production of supporting evidence, disclosure of material facts, and requests for cross-examination where necessary. The article uses the Jajodia Finance proceedings to illustrate the consequences of failing to respond to a notice on a claimed share-trading loss and failing to participate before the first appellate authority. It recommends placing additional evidence before the appellate authority with reasons for earlier non-production, seeking comments from the assessing officer, challenging adverse factual findings where appropriate, and requesting remand for fresh consideration when relevant material has not been examined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 08:21:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 08:21:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Learning from reported chain of judgments - in action of assessee or his representatives and non-cooperation with tax authority must be avoided. Prompt compliance is always good.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17088</link>
      <description>Taxpayer cooperation in assessment and appeal proceedings requires prompt replies to show-cause notices, production of supporting evidence, disclosure of material facts, and requests for cross-examination where necessary. The article uses the Jajodia Finance proceedings to illustrate the consequences of failing to respond to a notice on a claimed share-trading loss and failing to participate before the first appellate authority. It recommends placing additional evidence before the appellate authority with reasons for earlier non-production, seeking comments from the assessing officer, challenging adverse factual findings where appropriate, and requesting remand for fresh consideration when relevant material has not been examined.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 08:21:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>