<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Supreme Court Clarifies the Scope of Post-Award Interim Relief Under Section 9: Higher Threshold for Unsuccessful Parties.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17086</link>
    <description>Post-award interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, is available even to a party unsuccessful before the arbitral tribunal. However, such relief is confined to rare and compelling circumstances and requires heightened scrutiny. The applicant must satisfy the requirements of a strong prima facie case, balance of convenience, irreparable injury, and overall interests of justice. Interim measures must not indirectly stay, suspend, or neutralise an award, and courts must not reappreciate evidence or review the merits of the arbitral dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 08:21:45 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 16:58:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914981" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Clarifies the Scope of Post-Award Interim Relief Under Section 9: Higher Threshold for Unsuccessful Parties.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17086</link>
      <description>Post-award interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, is available even to a party unsuccessful before the arbitral tribunal. However, such relief is confined to rare and compelling circumstances and requires heightened scrutiny. The applicant must satisfy the requirements of a strong prima facie case, balance of convenience, irreparable injury, and overall interests of justice. Interim measures must not indirectly stay, suspend, or neutralise an award, and courts must not reappreciate evidence or review the merits of the arbitral dispute.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Corporate Laws / IBC / SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 08:21:45 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>