<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 90 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796217</link>
    <description>Writ review extends to a private body performing a sector-wide regulatory function where its action materially affects an advocate&#039;s professional rights. A banking fraud-prevention Caution List may address fraud involving dishonest intent or deliberate wrongdoing, but cannot be used to list an advocate solely for negligent legal advice or deficient title verification. Banks may end empanelment for dissatisfaction, yet cannot impose sector-wide professional consequences or determine alleged professional incompetence. The Advocates Act assigns disciplinary assessment of advocates&#039; negligence or misconduct exclusively to Bar Councils through a structured process. Adverse Caution List remarks were required to be removed, and the Bar Council of India was directed to review disciplinary accountability and continuing legal education.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 10:57:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 90 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796217</link>
      <description>Writ review extends to a private body performing a sector-wide regulatory function where its action materially affects an advocate&#039;s professional rights. A banking fraud-prevention Caution List may address fraud involving dishonest intent or deliberate wrongdoing, but cannot be used to list an advocate solely for negligent legal advice or deficient title verification. Banks may end empanelment for dissatisfaction, yet cannot impose sector-wide professional consequences or determine alleged professional incompetence. The Advocates Act assigns disciplinary assessment of advocates&#039; negligence or misconduct exclusively to Bar Councils through a structured process. Adverse Caution List remarks were required to be removed, and the Bar Council of India was directed to review disciplinary accountability and continuing legal education.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>