https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796219 Repeated mechanical adjournment requests undermine timely justice delivery and may justify dismissal for non-prosecution. Under Rule 20 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982, an appeal was dismissed after the appellant repeatedly sought adjournments beyond the permitted limit and did not pursue the matter. Repeated adjournments, whether sought personally or through counsel, are condemned because routine grants delay adjudication and impair the justice delivery system. en-us Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Aug 2026 08:20:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796219 Repeated mechanical adjournment requests undermine timely justice delivery and may justify dismissal for non-prosecution. Under Rule 20 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982, an appeal was dismissed after the appellant repeatedly sought adjournments beyond the permitted limit and did not pursue the matter. Repeated adjournments, whether sought personally or through counsel, are condemned because routine grants delay adjudication and impair the justice delivery system. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796219