https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796220 Mechanical requests for adjournment and their routine grant undermine the justice-delivery system. The notes state that repeated adjournments have been condemned, referring to Supreme Court observations in Ishwar Lal Mali Rathod. They further describe dismissal of an appeal for non-prosecution under Rule 20 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982, after the appellant repeatedly sought adjournments beyond the permitted limit. The practical effect is that persistent failure to proceed with an appeal, coupled with excessive adjournment requests, may lead to dismissal for non-prosecution. en-us Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Aug 2026 08:20:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796220 Mechanical requests for adjournment and their routine grant undermine the justice-delivery system. The notes state that repeated adjournments have been condemned, referring to Supreme Court observations in Ishwar Lal Mali Rathod. They further describe dismissal of an appeal for non-prosecution under Rule 20 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982, after the appellant repeatedly sought adjournments beyond the permitted limit. The practical effect is that persistent failure to proceed with an appeal, coupled with excessive adjournment requests, may lead to dismissal for non-prosecution. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796220