<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 97 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796224</link>
    <description>Turnover and transaction charges collected by a stockbroker form part of the taxable value for service tax where they are the provider&#039;s expense rather than amounts paid solely as a pure agent for the service recipient. The charges became taxable from 16 May 2008, and the stated analysis concludes that the stockbroker did not satisfy the pure-agent condition. Extended limitation may apply where a provider consciously fails to file returns and disclose liability despite a clarification that gross amounts received are taxable and a denial of reimbursable treatment. The notes state that such non-disclosure constitutes wilful suppression, sustaining the tax liability and extended limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 08:20:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 97 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796224</link>
      <description>Turnover and transaction charges collected by a stockbroker form part of the taxable value for service tax where they are the provider&#039;s expense rather than amounts paid solely as a pure agent for the service recipient. The charges became taxable from 16 May 2008, and the stated analysis concludes that the stockbroker did not satisfy the pure-agent condition. Extended limitation may apply where a provider consciously fails to file returns and disclose liability despite a clarification that gross amounts received are taxable and a denial of reimbursable treatment. The notes state that such non-disclosure constitutes wilful suppression, sustaining the tax liability and extended limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>