<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 105 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796232</link>
    <description>Freezing orders under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act are examined in relation to the requirement of sufficient reasons to believe under Section 17 and compliance with the mandatory safeguards for retention of property under Section 20. The note also addresses confirmation of freezing action by the Adjudicating Authority under Section 8, focusing on whether statutory preconditions were met before confirmation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 08:20:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 105 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796232</link>
      <description>Freezing orders under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act are examined in relation to the requirement of sufficient reasons to believe under Section 17 and compliance with the mandatory safeguards for retention of property under Section 20. The note also addresses confirmation of freezing action by the Adjudicating Authority under Section 8, focusing on whether statutory preconditions were met before confirmation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>