https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796236 An unadjudicated assertion in pleadings before the Supreme Court establishes only that the assertion was made; it neither declares law under Article 141 nor determines an entity's applicable statutory regime. That regime must be assessed under the governing framework based on the entity's objects, activities, operational area and relevant circumstances. Mandamus ordinarily requires a distinct prior demand for performance of a mandatory duty and a subsequent refusal or neglect within a reasonable time. Without evidence of such demand and refusal, and where jurisdiction over the entity is disputed, mandamus is not warranted. en-us Fri, 17 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Aug 2026 08:20:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796236 An unadjudicated assertion in pleadings before the Supreme Court establishes only that the assertion was made; it neither declares law under Article 141 nor determines an entity's applicable statutory regime. That regime must be assessed under the governing framework based on the entity's objects, activities, operational area and relevant circumstances. Mandamus ordinarily requires a distinct prior demand for performance of a mandatory duty and a subsequent refusal or neglect within a reasonable time. Without evidence of such demand and refusal, and where jurisdiction over the entity is disputed, mandamus is not warranted. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 17 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796236