<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 111 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796238</link>
    <description>Cross-objections under the Customs Act may challenge any adverse part of an order once an appeal is filed, not merely the appellant&#039;s grounds. Declared import values cannot be rejected without evidence of a statutory related-party relationship, price influence, additional consideration, or excess remittance; proforma invoices, relationships among persons behind separate entities, and consultancy or investment payments are insufficient. Post-import redetermination of retail sale price lacked statutory machinery for the relevant period, and undisclosed invoices prejudiced the importer&#039;s defence. A transdermal foot patch intended for therapeutic relief and improved circulation is classifiable as a medicament, not a skin-care preparation. Consequential undervaluation, confiscation and penalty findings lack foundation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 11:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914954" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 111 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796238</link>
      <description>Cross-objections under the Customs Act may challenge any adverse part of an order once an appeal is filed, not merely the appellant&#039;s grounds. Declared import values cannot be rejected without evidence of a statutory related-party relationship, price influence, additional consideration, or excess remittance; proforma invoices, relationships among persons behind separate entities, and consultancy or investment payments are insufficient. Post-import redetermination of retail sale price lacked statutory machinery for the relevant period, and undisclosed invoices prejudiced the importer&#039;s defence. A transdermal foot patch intended for therapeutic relief and improved circulation is classifiable as a medicament, not a skin-care preparation. Consequential undervaluation, confiscation and penalty findings lack foundation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>