<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 118 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796245</link>
    <description>Section 127C(5) of the Customs Act requires the Settlement Commission to provide the settlement applicant and jurisdictional Commissioner an opportunity of hearing after considering the Commissioner&#039;s report. The notes explain that using an undisclosed report to enhance customs-duty liability denies the applicant a meaningful opportunity to answer adverse material and breaches natural justice. They also address connected settlement applications arising from the same seized goods, stating that inconsistent treatment without considering their intrinsic connection requires fresh consideration under the statutory procedure. The stated principle is that adverse material underlying liability must be disclosed and effectively answered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 08:20:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914947" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 118 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796245</link>
      <description>Section 127C(5) of the Customs Act requires the Settlement Commission to provide the settlement applicant and jurisdictional Commissioner an opportunity of hearing after considering the Commissioner&#039;s report. The notes explain that using an undisclosed report to enhance customs-duty liability denies the applicant a meaningful opportunity to answer adverse material and breaches natural justice. They also address connected settlement applications arising from the same seized goods, stating that inconsistent treatment without considering their intrinsic connection requires fresh consideration under the statutory procedure. The stated principle is that adverse material underlying liability must be disclosed and effectively answered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>