<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 119 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796246</link>
    <description>Withdrawal of a summons issued under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962 to an advocate for a legal opinion rendered the related challenge infructuous. The text notes that summoning an advocate who has provided a legal opinion should ordinarily be confined to rare and exceptional circumstances, requiring authorities to exercise due care and caution. The writ petition and pending applications were disposed of after the summons was withdrawn.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 08:20:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 119 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796246</link>
      <description>Withdrawal of a summons issued under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962 to an advocate for a legal opinion rendered the related challenge infructuous. The text notes that summoning an advocate who has provided a legal opinion should ordinarily be confined to rare and exceptional circumstances, requiring authorities to exercise due care and caution. The writ petition and pending applications were disposed of after the summons was withdrawn.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>