<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 129 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796256</link>
    <description>Section 80P(2)(d) permits a co-operative housing society to deduct interest or dividends received from investments with another co-operative society. A co-operative bank is treated as a co-operative society for this purpose; section 80P(4) restricts a co-operative bank&#039;s own eligibility for deduction but does not restrict another co-operative society&#039;s deduction for interest earned on deposits with that bank. The interest deduction was therefore allowable. Delay in filing the first appeal may be condoned under section 249(3) where sufficient cause, absence of mala fides, and a justice-oriented approach outweigh a technical limitation lapse, enabling adjudication on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 08:20:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 129 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796256</link>
      <description>Section 80P(2)(d) permits a co-operative housing society to deduct interest or dividends received from investments with another co-operative society. A co-operative bank is treated as a co-operative society for this purpose; section 80P(4) restricts a co-operative bank&#039;s own eligibility for deduction but does not restrict another co-operative society&#039;s deduction for interest earned on deposits with that bank. The interest deduction was therefore allowable. Delay in filing the first appeal may be condoned under section 249(3) where sufficient cause, absence of mala fides, and a justice-oriented approach outweigh a technical limitation lapse, enabling adjudication on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>