https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53016 Products previously held to be Ayurvedic medicaments remained classified under Heading 30.03, as the earlier Tribunal ruling in the assessee's own case continued to govern and no stay of that order was shown. Goods supplied to hotels were also valued under Section 4A because they were notified goods required to bear retail sale price declarations; the hotel supply channel did not displace the statutory valuation, and the Rule 34 exclusion was not proved on the facts. The impugned orders were sustained and the Revenue's appeals failed on both classification and valuation. en-us Wed, 09 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Jul 2024 16:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53016 Products previously held to be Ayurvedic medicaments remained classified under Heading 30.03, as the earlier Tribunal ruling in the assessee's own case continued to govern and no stay of that order was shown. Goods supplied to hotels were also valued under Section 4A because they were notified goods required to bear retail sale price declarations; the hotel supply channel did not displace the statutory valuation, and the Rule 34 exclusion was not proved on the facts. The impugned orders were sustained and the Revenue's appeals failed on both classification and valuation. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 09 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53016