<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 138 - GSTAT NEW DELHI-[PB]</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796265</link>
    <description>Additional input tax credit must be passed to homebuyers through commensurate price reductions under the anti-profiteering framework; the article states that unpassed credit, quantified from the developer&#039;s records and apportioned by saleable area, constituted profiteering. It explains that Notification No. 19/2024-Central Tax prospectively bars fresh examination requests from 1 April 2025 but does not abate investigations or adjudicatory proceedings already instituted. It further states that a pending Supreme Court challenge does not suspend the governing provision or proceedings absent a stay order. The quantified benefit is payable to eligible buyers with prescribed interest, while no penalty applies for a period preceding commencement of the relevant penalty provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 08:20:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 138 - GSTAT NEW DELHI-[PB]</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796265</link>
      <description>Additional input tax credit must be passed to homebuyers through commensurate price reductions under the anti-profiteering framework; the article states that unpassed credit, quantified from the developer&#039;s records and apportioned by saleable area, constituted profiteering. It explains that Notification No. 19/2024-Central Tax prospectively bars fresh examination requests from 1 April 2025 but does not abate investigations or adjudicatory proceedings already instituted. It further states that a pending Supreme Court challenge does not suspend the governing provision or proceedings absent a stay order. The quantified benefit is payable to eligible buyers with prescribed interest, while no penalty applies for a period preceding commencement of the relevant penalty provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796265</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>