<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Additional input tax credit must reduce flat prices; pending anti-profiteering proceedings continue despite future-request restrictions or unstayed constitutional challenges.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102321</link>
    <description>Section 171(1) requires suppliers to pass additional input tax credit to recipients through a commensurate reduction in price. In a real-estate project, additional GST credit may be determined against available pre-GST credit using project records and apportioned by saleable area; failure to prove that the resulting benefit reached eligible homebuyers supports a finding of profiteering. A notification stopping acceptance of fresh anti-profiteering requests operates prospectively and does not, without express provision, terminate pending investigations or adjudications. The pendency of a constitutional challenge does not suspend application of the prevailing law unless a stay order covers the provision or proceedings. Applicable interest may accompany quantified benefit, while penalty depends on whether the penalty provision was in force during the contravention period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 08:20:38 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 08:20:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Additional input tax credit must reduce flat prices; pending anti-profiteering proceedings continue despite future-request restrictions or unstayed constitutional challenges.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102321</link>
      <description>Section 171(1) requires suppliers to pass additional input tax credit to recipients through a commensurate reduction in price. In a real-estate project, additional GST credit may be determined against available pre-GST credit using project records and apportioned by saleable area; failure to prove that the resulting benefit reached eligible homebuyers supports a finding of profiteering. A notification stopping acceptance of fresh anti-profiteering requests operates prospectively and does not, without express provision, terminate pending investigations or adjudications. The pendency of a constitutional challenge does not suspend application of the prevailing law unless a stay order covers the provision or proceedings. Applicable interest may accompany quantified benefit, while penalty depends on whether the penalty provision was in force during the contravention period.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 08:20:38 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>