https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102307 Unadjudicated assertions in pleadings filed before the Supreme Court do not establish the legal correctness of those assertions or bind other courts on the statute governing a company. The Court-of-Record status under Article 129 confirms the record of what was asserted, while binding force under Article 141 arises only from law declared by the Supreme Court. The applicable company-law regime must be determined from the statutory framework and the company's objects, activities and operational circumstances. The notes also explain that mandamus ordinarily requires a prior distinct demand to the statutory authority and its refusal or neglect; without those prerequisites, mandamus cannot issue. en-us Mon, 03 Aug 2026 08:20:38 +0530 Mon, 03 Aug 2026 08:20:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102307 Unadjudicated assertions in pleadings filed before the Supreme Court do not establish the legal correctness of those assertions or bind other courts on the statute governing a company. The Court-of-Record status under Article 129 confirms the record of what was asserted, while binding force under Article 141 arises only from law declared by the Supreme Court. The applicable company-law regime must be determined from the statutory framework and the company's objects, activities and operational circumstances. The notes also explain that mandamus ordinarily requires a prior distinct demand to the statutory authority and its refusal or neglect; without those prerequisites, mandamus cannot issue. Highlights Companies Law Mon, 03 Aug 2026 08:20:38 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102307