<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 2164 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470628</link>
    <description>Reassessment based solely on unverified suspicious information and a desire to conduct inquiry lacks a direct nexus between the information and alleged income escapement. Where no addition is made for the transaction forming the recorded basis for reopening, reassessment jurisdiction cannot be retained to assess separate income detected during the proceedings. The Section 148 notice and consequent reassessment were void from inception and quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 19:57:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 2164 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470628</link>
      <description>Reassessment based solely on unverified suspicious information and a desire to conduct inquiry lacks a direct nexus between the information and alleged income escapement. Where no addition is made for the transaction forming the recorded basis for reopening, reassessment jurisdiction cannot be retained to assess separate income detected during the proceedings. The Section 148 notice and consequent reassessment were void from inception and quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>