<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 2164 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470628</link>
    <description>Reassessment based only on unverified and suspicious information requires a recorded belief showing a direct nexus with income escaping assessment, not merely a desire to conduct verification. Where no addition is made for the transaction forming the stated basis for reopening, jurisdiction cannot be retained to assess separate income independently identified during reassessment. The article states that the Section 148 notice and consequential reassessment were void from inception and quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 19:57:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 2164 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470628</link>
      <description>Reassessment based only on unverified and suspicious information requires a recorded belief showing a direct nexus with income escaping assessment, not merely a desire to conduct verification. Where no addition is made for the transaction forming the stated basis for reopening, jurisdiction cannot be retained to assess separate income independently identified during reassessment. The article states that the Section 148 notice and consequential reassessment were void from inception and quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>