<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 2166 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470630</link>
    <description>Long-term capital gains from transfer of immovable property cannot be assessed in the legal titleholder&#039;s hands where another person held beneficial ownership and possession, received the entire sale consideration, and was already assessed on that gain. The purchaser paid consideration to the beneficial owner and spouse, deducted tax at source in the beneficial owner&#039;s PAN, and the Revenue accepted that the consideration belonged to that person. As the legal titleholder neither received consideration nor beneficially owned the property, taxing the same gain again would result in unjustified multiple taxation. The capital-gains addition was directed to be deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 19:57:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 2166 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470630</link>
      <description>Long-term capital gains from transfer of immovable property cannot be assessed in the legal titleholder&#039;s hands where another person held beneficial ownership and possession, received the entire sale consideration, and was already assessed on that gain. The purchaser paid consideration to the beneficial owner and spouse, deducted tax at source in the beneficial owner&#039;s PAN, and the Revenue accepted that the consideration belonged to that person. As the legal titleholder neither received consideration nor beneficially owned the property, taxing the same gain again would result in unjustified multiple taxation. The capital-gains addition was directed to be deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>