<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 145 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53010</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, allowed the appeal regarding the valuation of goods under new Valuation Rules effective from 1-7-2000. The Tribunal held that the appellants correctly adjusted the duty amounts paid instead of claiming a refund, as they had paid the differential duty and credited it at the recipient factory. The Tribunal found no justification to sustain the demands confirmed by lower authorities, setting aside the impugned orders and allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 10:19:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91487" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 145 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53010</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, allowed the appeal regarding the valuation of goods under new Valuation Rules effective from 1-7-2000. The Tribunal held that the appellants correctly adjusted the duty amounts paid instead of claiming a refund, as they had paid the differential duty and credited it at the recipient factory. The Tribunal found no justification to sustain the demands confirmed by lower authorities, setting aside the impugned orders and allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>