<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cheque-dishonour liability remains personal: non-signatory spouse cannot be vicariously prosecuted for a sole proprietorship&#039;s dishonoured cheque.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102298</link>
    <description>Cheque-dishonour liability under Section 138 of the NI Act is personal to the drawer, account holder and signatory; a non-signatory spouse of a sole proprietor cannot be prosecuted merely on allegations of control. A sole proprietorship is not a company for Section 141, so vicarious liability cannot extend to persons other than the proprietor. A demand notice seeking only part of the cheque amount fails the requirement to demand the &quot;said amount of money&quot;, preventing the cause of action from arising. Further, process against an accused residing outside the Magistrate&#039;s jurisdiction requires a mandatory prior inquiry or investigation. Suppression of the concern&#039;s sole-proprietorship status was treated as abuse of process. Proceedings against the spouse were quashed, while trial against other accused continued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 13:19:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 13:19:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Cheque-dishonour liability remains personal: non-signatory spouse cannot be vicariously prosecuted for a sole proprietorship&#039;s dishonoured cheque.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102298</link>
      <description>Cheque-dishonour liability under Section 138 of the NI Act is personal to the drawer, account holder and signatory; a non-signatory spouse of a sole proprietor cannot be prosecuted merely on allegations of control. A sole proprietorship is not a company for Section 141, so vicarious liability cannot extend to persons other than the proprietor. A demand notice seeking only part of the cheque amount fails the requirement to demand the &quot;said amount of money&quot;, preventing the cause of action from arising. Further, process against an accused residing outside the Magistrate&#039;s jurisdiction requires a mandatory prior inquiry or investigation. Suppression of the concern&#039;s sole-proprietorship status was treated as abuse of process. Proceedings against the spouse were quashed, while trial against other accused continued.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 13:19:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>