<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>No Addition under Income Tax Law on Bogus Purchases, Where Sales Are Accepted and Supplies Are Backed by GST Records and Banking Trail</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17081</link>
    <description>Alleged bogus-purchase additions require tangible, transaction-specific evidence where purchases are supported by audited books, supplier confirmations, invoices, transport records, banking-channel payments, production-yield reconciliation and accepted corresponding sales. Supplier GST registration, filed returns and allowed input tax credit may further corroborate the supply chain and weaken a parallel allegation that purchases are fictitious. The article distinguishes such documented transactions from cases where the taxpayer fails to establish the initial evidentiary foundation, and notes that undisputed sales may require focus on any embedded profit element rather than the full purchase value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 08:36:11 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 08:36:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>No Addition under Income Tax Law on Bogus Purchases, Where Sales Are Accepted and Supplies Are Backed by GST Records and Banking Trail</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17081</link>
      <description>Alleged bogus-purchase additions require tangible, transaction-specific evidence where purchases are supported by audited books, supplier confirmations, invoices, transport records, banking-channel payments, production-yield reconciliation and accepted corresponding sales. Supplier GST registration, filed returns and allowed input tax credit may further corroborate the supply chain and weaken a parallel allegation that purchases are fictitious. The article distinguishes such documented transactions from cases where the taxpayer fails to establish the initial evidentiary foundation, and notes that undisputed sales may require focus on any embedded profit element rather than the full purchase value.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 08:36:11 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17081</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>