<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 2 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796129</link>
    <description>Recovery of disputed tax was challenged through a writ petition while the underlying tax appeal remained pending before the Tribunal. A statutory remedy was available to seek a stay of recovery from the Additional Commissioner, and no basis for writ intervention was identified. The petitioner was therefore required to pursue that alternative remedy for stay of recovery rather than obtain writ relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 08:34:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 2 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796129</link>
      <description>Recovery of disputed tax was challenged through a writ petition while the underlying tax appeal remained pending before the Tribunal. A statutory remedy was available to seek a stay of recovery from the Additional Commissioner, and no basis for writ intervention was identified. The petitioner was therefore required to pursue that alternative remedy for stay of recovery rather than obtain writ relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>