https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796150 A creditor that was informed its claim had been classified as contingent during the corporate insolvency resolution process had to challenge that classification before the Adjudicating Authority. Seeking modification of an interim stay before another forum did not replace the need for a timely challenge within the insolvency process. Once the resolution plan was approved, fully implemented, and the insolvency proceeding closed, it could not be disturbed by claims that had not been timely pursued. The post-implementation challenge to the resolution plan was therefore not maintainable. en-us Thu, 30 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Aug 2026 08:34:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796150 A creditor that was informed its claim had been classified as contingent during the corporate insolvency resolution process had to challenge that classification before the Adjudicating Authority. Seeking modification of an interim stay before another forum did not replace the need for a timely challenge within the insolvency process. Once the resolution plan was approved, fully implemented, and the insolvency proceeding closed, it could not be disturbed by claims that had not been timely pursued. The post-implementation challenge to the resolution plan was therefore not maintainable. Case-Laws IBC Thu, 30 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796150