<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 44 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796171</link>
    <description>Revision under section 263 requires the assessment record or an independent enquiry to establish that the assessment is erroneous and unsustainable; it cannot rest merely on a preference for further or more comprehensive investigation. The notes state that the Assessing Officer examined notices, explanations, books, bank records, confirmations, invoices, e-way bills, GST records, affidavits and seized material, and made additions. They also note that a rectification order enhancing the accommodation-entry addition and the prior assessment approval were not considered in the revision proceedings. The revisionary jurisdiction was therefore described as invalid and the section 263 order as quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 08:34:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 44 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796171</link>
      <description>Revision under section 263 requires the assessment record or an independent enquiry to establish that the assessment is erroneous and unsustainable; it cannot rest merely on a preference for further or more comprehensive investigation. The notes state that the Assessing Officer examined notices, explanations, books, bank records, confirmations, invoices, e-way bills, GST records, affidavits and seized material, and made additions. They also note that a rectification order enhancing the accommodation-entry addition and the prior assessment approval were not considered in the revision proceedings. The revisionary jurisdiction was therefore described as invalid and the section 263 order as quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>