<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 53 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796180</link>
    <description>Deletion of the disallowance of loss on sale of shares did not raise a substantial question of law where similar transactions for the preceding assessment year had been accepted as genuine on documentary evidence. As no contrary material was produced to displace that evidence, the same reasoning applied for the relevant year. The Gujarat HC noted that the Tribunal&#039;s earlier decision had already been confirmed and that the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 08:34:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 53 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796180</link>
      <description>Deletion of the disallowance of loss on sale of shares did not raise a substantial question of law where similar transactions for the preceding assessment year had been accepted as genuine on documentary evidence. As no contrary material was produced to displace that evidence, the same reasoning applied for the relevant year. The Gujarat HC noted that the Tribunal&#039;s earlier decision had already been confirmed and that the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>