<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 67 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796194</link>
    <description>A writ petition concerning an alternate statutory remedy under the CGST/KGST Act was disposed of at the petitioner&#039;s request, with liberty to file an appeal. The specified period was directed to be excluded in computing limitation under section 14 of the Limitation Act, provided the appeal is filed within six weeks. The direction preserves the petitioner&#039;s ability to pursue the statutory appellate remedy without the specified period counting towards limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 08:34:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 67 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796194</link>
      <description>A writ petition concerning an alternate statutory remedy under the CGST/KGST Act was disposed of at the petitioner&#039;s request, with liberty to file an appeal. The specified period was directed to be excluded in computing limitation under section 14 of the Limitation Act, provided the appeal is filed within six weeks. The direction preserves the petitioner&#039;s ability to pursue the statutory appellate remedy without the specified period counting towards limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>