<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 70 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796197</link>
    <description>Rectification of mistake cannot be used to reopen, review, recall or substantially modify a concluded order-in-appeal. The notes state that a binding coordinate-bench decision directly governed the validity of the impugned proceedings. Applying that precedent, the rectification order and the concluded appellate order were treated as unsustainable and quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 08:34:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 70 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796197</link>
      <description>Rectification of mistake cannot be used to reopen, review, recall or substantially modify a concluded order-in-appeal. The notes state that a binding coordinate-bench decision directly governed the validity of the impugned proceedings. Applying that precedent, the rectification order and the concluded appellate order were treated as unsustainable and quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>