<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 82 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796209</link>
    <description>Rectification of a GST adjudication order was identified as the appropriate statutory remedy where the taxpayer asserted that tax had been discharged on the entire invoice amount. The note records that the taxpayer may file a rectification application supported by relevant documents, which the proper officer must entertain, hear, and decide within the specified period. The writ petition was disposed of with the taxpayer relegated to rectification proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 08:34:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 82 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796209</link>
      <description>Rectification of a GST adjudication order was identified as the appropriate statutory remedy where the taxpayer asserted that tax had been discharged on the entire invoice amount. The note records that the taxpayer may file a rectification application supported by relevant documents, which the proper officer must entertain, hear, and decide within the specified period. The writ petition was disposed of with the taxpayer relegated to rectification proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>