<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 83 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796210</link>
    <description>Regular bail was granted in a prosecution alleging fraudulent availment and passing of input tax credit. Investigation had concluded and the final complaint was filed. As the prosecution relied on documentary and electronic material already held by the Department, further custodial detention was not considered necessary. Continued custody was also unwarranted because the applicant had been detained since January 2026 and trial was likely to take considerable time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 08:34:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 83 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796210</link>
      <description>Regular bail was granted in a prosecution alleging fraudulent availment and passing of input tax credit. Investigation had concluded and the final complaint was filed. As the prosecution relied on documentary and electronic material already held by the Department, further custodial detention was not considered necessary. Continued custody was also unwarranted because the applicant had been detained since January 2026 and trial was likely to take considerable time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796210</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>